• NC-30 Shock Differences between years?

Posted: **Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:51 pm**

I'm wondering if there are differences in the rear shock (other than features, I'm talking length, spring rate, etc) between an '88 and '92+ NC-30? Looking to order a Penske and their book only has '92+.

Also if anyone has experience with an HRC type rear link, I was curious how that might affect the linear spring rate curve, if there are any changes aside from ride-height.

Thanks!

Posted: **Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:09 pm**

The physical sizes were the same for all the shocks - 1989 -1994

The 1989 did not have a remote res, the 90-onwards did.

Penske will sort you out.

There was a lad on here a while back, EddieHRCrider (I think) and he was on BARF too..he had a Penske on his moto..8895 model? That sound right?

Posted: **Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:36 pm**

Which model makes no difference, Penkse shocks are all modular... mine has a remote reservoir but the bike says it's an '89... odd. Is the physical dimensions the same as an RVF too?

Posted: **Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:37 pm**

RVF top mounts are different...but regards length etc I am not sure. Think theya re the same,.

I use an RS250 shock that is 315mm (think) along with an RVF linkage and the rear is pretty high and works very well.

Posted: **Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:58 pm**

IIRC it's 5mm different between RVF and VFR, shocks themselves are identical mounting but the RVF has a ride height adjuster on the top while the VFR bolts direct to the frame.

Druid

Posted: **Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:47 pm**

Thanks for the input, ordered a Penske today :D

NC-30 Shock Differences between years?

NC-30 Shock Differences between years?

Re: NC-30 Shock Differences between years?

Re: NC-30 Shock Differences between years?

Re: NC-30 Shock Differences between years?

Re: NC-30 Shock Differences between years?

Re: NC-30 Shock Differences between years?