Page 1 of 2

Comparing rearsets.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:11 pm
by PARUS
Selling mine Youshi rearset, because they to high for me.
Here is a picture:

Image

Here is the option to change:

1. Replica of COERCE rearset for NC29. Adjustable by high\length. Here is my choose for now.
Image
Image
Image

2. Race suppliers... Looks strong, but absolutely non-adjustable.
Image

3. VORTEX... not sure about them, pricey, cool, not sure about them. It was fitted by garyboy_palaboy and he able to give more info I think.
Image
Image

4.Other. Looks I'll have same problem - too high.
Image

Your opinion ?

Re: Comparing rearsets.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:19 pm
by chrisja2
PARUS, i have the Race supplies direct ones on my bike. They are the same position as OE ones. For £99 they are ok to be honest, but obviously not as adjustable as the other ones youre looking at. Id be tempted in your rearsets if you sell them, or if you like mine maybe some sort of exchange?

Chris.

Re: Comparing rearsets.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:50 pm
by CMSMJ1
2 and 4 are the same aren't they?

If they are what I think then they are crap and made from cheese. A friend had some on his NC30 and they flexed and were useless.

Personally I love the functional chunky pieces of alloy like the SES ones.

Re: Comparing rearsets.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:55 pm
by PARUS
chrisja2 wrote:PARUS, i have the Race supplies direct ones on my bike. They are the same position as OE ones. For £99 they are ok to be honest, but obviously not as adjustable as the other ones youre looking at. Id be tempted in your rearsets if you sell them, or if you like mine maybe some sort of exchange?

Chris.
Sorry mate. I have deposit for them and looks like it already sold. Just looking to change mine.
Race suppliers is good, but not adjustable... that main problem for them

How know where possible to buy something like this for NC29
Image
Image

Re: Comparing rearsets.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:16 pm
by chrisja2
CMSMJ1 wrote:2 and 4 are the same aren't they?

If they are what I think then they are crap and made from cheese. A friend had some on his NC30 and they flexed and were useless.

Personally I love the functional chunky pieces of alloy like the SES ones.
+1 on the SES ones, but again they are quite back/high and are non adjustable.

Re: Comparing rearsets.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:58 pm
by w00dzy
I like the vortex ones..

Re: Comparing rearsets.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:49 pm
by cress87
You should be able to get some brackets machined if you go to an engineering place with the measurements. ;)

Re: Comparing rearsets.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 6:21 pm
by PARUS
As for my experience... we have some rearset from Hong Kong on one of our cbr600 and quality acceptable. When bike crashed - it's doesn't matter - VORTEX or hongkong stuff broken same way. :whistle: :ninja:

Re: Comparing rearsets.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 9:18 pm
by yeurman
agree, the SES rear sets, which I have been using for 5 years now are, for me perfect, and not expensive. They are a little higher and further back than standard.

Re: Comparing rearsets.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 9:39 pm
by greggo
+1 on the ses pegs. Funnily enough I had s set of brackets made so my spare race supplies set would sit in the same place