Page 11 of 12
Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:30 pm
by fastdruid
Feel like modifying two frames?
Druid
Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:39 pm
by Smev
if it goes well enough there may be a market for it!!!

Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:14 pm
by dave6970
When all these bikes have been dynoed, are we going to get all the readings on here so that we see who was right about there bikes BHP

Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:07 pm
by The Hamster
dave6970 wrote:When all these bikes have been dynoed, are we going to get all the readings on here so that we see who was right about there bikes BHP

I'll get Kevin to put a contract together saying he has too... Or on the other hand, I could just get him to print them all off and give them to me to upload. Ha Ha
Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:28 am
by wullvfr
is the standard bhp output of the nc30 rw or crank power?its always referred to as being in and around 59bhp in mags and stuff!!!!
wull
Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:04 pm
by The Hamster
wullvfr wrote:is the standard bhp output of the nc30 rw or crank power?its always referred to as being in and around 59bhp in mags and stuff!!!!
wull
I emailed Honda UK with this exact question and they told me the Honda Quoted 58bhp Standard Factory Power is measured at the engine and not the Rear Wheel.
Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:17 pm
by wullvfr
so if 58bhp was crank then that would be roughly 52bhp rw power.anyone agree?
my nc30 when i had it was running 61.5bhp at the wheel,or im sure it was the wheel
wull
Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:37 pm
by CMSMJ1
lol...don't start this again

Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 1:12 pm
by alexwitham
lol...don't start this again
agreed

lol
Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 8:42 pm
by G-MAN
Just another silly question

but wen Honda measured it back in the day what RON Fuel did they use and was it really that efficient in today's standards?