Effect of discs past minimum thickness?

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
User avatar
speedy231278
NWAA Supporter
NWAA Supporter
Posts: 1549
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:58 am
Bike owned: RVF400, TZR125, ZXR750R
Re: Effect of discs past minimum thickness?

Post by speedy231278 »

Morespeedvicar wrote:And it wont pass its next mot..............
Assuming they even bother to measure them.....!
Image
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: Effect of discs past minimum thickness?

Post by Neosophist »

jetblack wrote:oh god, i'm not suggesting using them past min thickness, they're a little way off that yet.

I just want to know if the braking effect is reduced the thinner/closer to min thickness that they get or does the braking efficiency not directly correlate to the efficiency?
I don't think so.

Honda / whoever do extensive testing to find the limit point of the brake disc, they then set the minimum thickness ABOVE this level to ensure that the discs should always be replaced when they are in safety zone.

You shouldnt have any issues running them upto the minium thickness zone, providing there not damaged.
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
pip
Settled in member
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 5:56 pm
Re: Re: Effect of discs past minimum thickness?

Post by pip »

Neosophist wrote:
jetblack wrote:oh god, i'm not suggesting using them past min thickness, they're a little way off that yet.

I just want to know if the braking effect is reduced the thinner/closer to min thickness that they get or does the braking efficiency not directly correlate to the efficiency?
I don't think so.

Honda / whoever do extensive testing to find the limit point of the brake disc, they then set the minimum thickness ABOVE this level to ensure that the discs should always be replaced when they are in safety zone.

You shouldnt have any issues running them upto the minium thickness zone, providing there not damaged.
Agree'd. I'm not saying it's wise to run below min thickness but there will be a decent safety margin built in.

I can't see them having reduced stopping power. Might even have more due to the larger area because of the wear lip lol:grin::grin::grin:

Pip
andy1472
Settled in member
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:25 pm
Bike owned: VFR NC21
Re: Effect of discs past minimum thickness?

Post by andy1472 »

They don't ever bother measuring disks at all the garages I've had bikes tested at. They prob can't even spell micrometer, let alone use one.

Just change them mate or walk!
Jashdown
Settled in member
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:59 am
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Re: Effect of discs past minimum thickness?

Post by Jashdown »

Better handling, less unsprung weight. Lawl.
Morespeedvicar
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 1:37 am
Bike owned: Fzr400, NC30, CB50J, SS50Z KLR
Location: Grimsby
Re: Effect of discs past minimum thickness?

Post by Morespeedvicar »

Alot of mechanics can spot nakered discs a mile away, and usually only dig out the mircometer if something looks nakered! Well all the ones i know do anyway...
But yeah lessweight go faster, or just make the holes in them bigger aswell..............

Post Reply